Reply to: Michael Ernst
Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Problems with SPAMCOP test in JunkMail standard on Monday
2:33:57 PM
We make the WEIGHT10 and make SpamCop 9... then give
other test weights the ability to 'substantiate' SpamCop
or push the value to 10. We have all tests WARN except
WEIGHT10 which is HOLD. This enables us to view all
failed tests in captured email and see what combinations
of tests are working best and tweak them accordingly....
We had similar results with SpamCop alone, but decided
to make that process 'verified' by other tests.
I am a little concerned, because if you read SpamCop's
web site, they are soon going to be charging for this
service on a per setup or per user basis. I hope this
is not expensive.
--
Roger Heath
----- Copy of Original Message(s): -----
M> Hi, I'm using the 1.31 Beta of JunkMail standard and having fairly good luck
identifying spam with the WEIGHT tests. I've been expecting to see some results from
SPAMCOP as well, but have not
M> seen a single positive from SPAMCOP in the logs over a period of three weeks or
more,
--
ActivatorMail(tm) ver.011402 Scanned for all viruses by
www.activatormail.com intelligent anti-virus anti-spam service
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .
