>Some ideas on going to the next level: > >a)give the SpamCop test a weight heavy enough to fail a message on its >own. Imperfect at best. > >b) use that permission-based Declude thingie discussed here a while >ago. Inconvenient to some. > >c) subscribe to a blacklist that somebody maintains and that interfaces >with Declude (which ain't hard). I certainly don't have the time to keep >one maintained. Plus, as soon as one address is blocked... you can fill >in the rest. > >d) a combination of the above.
... and "e", Message Sniffer ( http://www.sortmonster.com ), which has the same advantage of the DNS-based spam tests (it's constantly updated), but since it works by analyzing the content (rather than the source) of the E-mail, it can catch a lot of the mail that the DNS-based tests don't. It does cost money (and no, we don't get a commission <G>), but is worth considering if you're getting much spam that doesn't fail any of the tests. -Scott --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web site at http://www.declude.com .
