>Since upgrading to 1.55 and also adding more ip4r tests, I am now seeing
>lots of missing X-RBL-Warning headers. We use Spam Review, and have been
>wondering why some messages were being held when only one or two tests were
>showing up in the "Junk Mail Warning" screen. We found that if we scrolled
>through the "Message Headers" section, that all test that failed show up in
>the X-Spam-Test-Failed line, and the message show that it got the correct
>weight in the X-Note line, so we were just wondering why some of the
>X-RBL-Warning headers are missing.
Could there be any per-user or per-domain settings accounting for this? Or
could the outgoing actions account for it?
> Example 1
>X-RBL-Warning: FIVETEN: 187.156.250.129.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com.
>X-Spam-Tests-Failed: DORKZTL, FIVETEN, NOMOREFUNN, WEIGHT10
>X-Note: Total spam test weight: 15
For example, this one could be normal of the FIVETEN test was set to WARN
in one of the config files, but the DORKZTL, NOMOREFUNN, and WEIGHT10 were
set to HOLD (or anything other than WARN).
Is this something that happens often enough that you could use the debug
mode until another one was discovered?
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". You can E-mail
[EMAIL PROTECTED] for assistance. You can visit our web
site at http://www.declude.com .
