|
If a message is addressed to multiple TO recipients
all on the same host, and one or more of those recipients has a custom JunkMail
configuration, how does Declude determine which configuration to use for
processing the message?
I have a user who does not want her account scanned
by JunkMail at all. She got a touch upset recently, thought her account
was being scanned again. What appears to have happened is that she got a
couple spam-wrapper messages on which there were multiple recipients, with
three different JunkMail configurations among those recipients:
ONE recipient has "SUBJECT Possible Spam" on
Weight10, and "ATTACH Probable Spam" on Weight14 or higher, which is
apparently the configuration used to process the messages in
question.
ONE of the recipients (her) has a configuration
with all tests disabled.
The rest of the recipients have the "default"
configuration for the host, which is "SUBJECT Possible Spam" on Weight14 or
Weight20, and DELETE on Weight30.
Does Declude use the most restrictive configuration
it finds among all the recipients? One message had a spam value of 16 and
one had 27, both high enough to trigger the Weight14 ATTACH for that particular
recipient's configuration.
I'm running Declude 1.53.
Glenn Z.
|
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] My Word Filtering File Rick Davidson
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] My Word Filtering File Glenn \\ WCNet
- IPWHOIS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] My Word Filterin... Eje Gustafsson
- Re: IPWHOIS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] My Word ... Glenn \\ WCNet
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] My Word Filtering File R. Scott Perry
- IPWHOIS:Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] My Word ... Eje Gustafsson
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] My Word Filtering File Rick Davidson
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The uphill battle against spam Tom
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The uphill battle against spam R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] The uphill battle against spam Matt Robertson
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] question regarding custom u... Glenn \\ WCNet
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] question regarding cust... R. Scott Perry
