> >> FWIW, the reason that the "double bounces" occur isn't because of a poor
>bouncing option <<
>
>well - the ONE pending enhancement is that we can use a BETTER mailer than
>imail1.exe that would permit us to send from <> - as it should be.
>
>THEN we would not SEE any bounces.
Good point, I hadn't taken that into account. That would work better
(although still send bounces to innocent victims, in the case of spam that
used a forged return address).
> >> IMail doesn't allow programs to intercept the SMTP transaction <<
>
>Unless you add a "pass through" proxy that PREpends the Imail SMTP. It
>would monitor port 25, pass through any traffic to Imail on an alternate
>port - but do the DNS based lookups on the mailfrom and the helo BEFORE
>Imail gets control.
True. That's something that we have given some though to (especially so
that we can have Declude work with other mailservers).
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
