>I have the log set to Mid and all of the RBL+ tests configured the
>same as your sample congif file, i.e.
>RBL
>DUL
>RBL+DUL
>etc.
>
>The tests run in order of appearance (RBL, then DUL, etc.) right?
Correct.
>If an e-mail fails RBL, DUL and RBL+DUL, would all three of them
>appear in the log as failed tests?
Yes.
>Looking at the MAPS site (actually at the contracts) it says that if
>the IP is on the list, they will respond in the 127/8 raange. Is it
>possible to configure for this range instead of an explicit IP like
>127.1.0.0.2?
Well, it sounds like MAPS is trying to be prepared in case they make
changes later. Declude doesn't allow for IP ranges in the return codes,
but there is a "catchall" of "*" that would work with any return code.
Is MAPS saying what would cause a result in the 127/8 range? I'm not sure
you would even want to test on 127/8 if you don't know what they will be
doing with those IPs. That's similar to just using one of the free spam
tests without checking to see what is does; if you are not careful, you'll
get a lot of E-mail blocked.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
