>Logic dictates that since there are more tests for a message to fail that
>there should be a higher percentage of messages showing up as SPAM now
>than there was before. I can only come up with 2 theories.
>
>Theory1 - Some spammers now realize their SPAM is not getting through and
>have since stopped sending to our mailserver. I consider this HIGHLY
>unlikely since we don't send out bounces, just delete messages (and also
>since I doubt this would alter spammer behavior anyway.)
Do you have a "nobody" alias set up to access all misaddressed mail? If
so, it could be that spammers were sending mail to those addresses, but
aren't anymore. They can send thousands of such E-mails, which can really
skew the percentage of spam.
>Theory2 - Do messages that fail any test associated with the DELETE action
>not appear in the console? I doubt this is the case either, but it would
>help to explain the drastic drop in the percentage of mail that the
>console is listing as SPAM.
No, that wouldn't cause a change.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
