Thanks Scott, I meant to say SPAMHEADERS in lieu of BADHEADERS...to
ya'll I was RFC ignorant...you had to figure the rest of the ignorance
out on your own...LOL


Jim Rooth
Klotron, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 16:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] BADHEADERS Test question



>So far I've been very happy with JunkMail. I'm only running a few tests
and
>it's catching a lot of spam and porn. However, I'm noticing the
occasional
>legitimate email from badly formatted clients. For example, JunkMail
caught
>a confirmation email from an online service that one of my co-workers
signed
>up for. This was a good email but it had badly formatted headers.
>Fortunately, I'm not rejecting or deleting emails as of yet but
eventually I
>will. How do you all deal with emails that fail the BADHEADERS test
because
>of poor mail clients/senders but are legit emails that need to be
delivered?
>I'm looking for my "next step" in configuring JunkMail. Any advice is
>appreciated.

I think that Jim's suggestion of relying on the weighting system is the
best answer.

My personal opinion, though, is that the BADHEADERS test should have a
high
weight towards the weighting system, as no mail client should be sending

out E-mail with non-RFC-compliant headers -- that's very bad.  Given how

much spam has increased lately, I think we're getting to the point where

broken E-mail headers can't be ignored any longer.  Note that the
problem
doesn't lie with the overworked mail server administrator on the other
side
-- it lies in the company that designed the mail client, that they are
collecting money from.

The SPAMHEADERS test (headers that are technically RFC-compliant , but
spamlike) will catch E-mail from quite a few poorly designed web sites,
and
*should* be fixed, but since the headers are RFC-compliant, a lower
weight
should be used with the SPAMHEADERS test.
                                         Scott

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---



---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to