I received the below email from the NJABL list.  They are changing their
formatting.  Up to this time we have been just using the following line
in the global.cfg file

NJABL           ip4r    dnsbl.njabl.org                 127.0.0.2
3       0

With these changes I would imagine in order to use the service I would
have to setup tests with each of those return statuses?

Is there a way to do something along the lines of 127.0.0.*?

Darrell


//Email Received From NJABL//
Due to many requests, and the fact that we now have code in place to
make 
detecting and notifying multi-stage open relays much more automated, we 
will begin differentiating between the various different types of spam 
sources in dnsbl.njabl.org by assigning a 127.0.0.X address to entries 
according to the following:

127.0.0.2 Verified Open Relay

127.0.0.3 Dialup or other dynamic IP ranges

127.0.0.4 Spam Sources
This will include both commercial spammers as well as some dial-up
direct-to-mx spammers and open proxies as it's not always possible to
differentiate between these sources.  For commercial spammers, once we
have spam on file from some of their IPs, we may add their entire IP
range if it can be reliably determined.

127.0.0.5 Multi-stage open relays
Before adding multi-stage open relays to our list, we make an attempt to
notify the NIC contact for their IP space and give them at least one
week to fix their systems.

127.0.0.8 Systems with insecure formmail.cgi or similar scripts CGI
which turn them into open relays

127.0.0.9 Open proxy servers

New entries will begin to use this format immediately.  Eventually, we
will 
convert all existing entries to this new differentiated format.  Another

notification will be sent when that has been completed.
//END OF EMAIL RECEIVED

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to