This is the recommended format, as it will automatically whitelist E-mail with the Habeas headers (which is the way that it was intended to be used).Are these all acceptable formats for testing on Habeas or monitoring its usage?WHITELIST HABEAS
Not good. This will cause spam to lose 20 points towards the weight. Instead, you would want:HABEAS habeas x x 0 -20
HABEAS habeas x x -20 0
The "habeas" test type will get triggered if the E-mail has the Habeas headers (the opposite of the way that a spam test normally works).
The habeas test type should only be used if you have a specific reason to do so (such as to automatically forward violations of the Habeas headers).
As far as I know, IMail can't insert the headers, so you would have to use Declude JunkMail to do it. :)And, assuming that we have a HABEAS ISP license, is this the recommended way to insert the Habeas headers? XOUTHEADER X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring XOUTHEADER X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated XOUTHEADER X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) etc.... Or, would it be better to implement insertion of Habeas headers in IMail?
The one catch is that you have to be careful that you don't violate the ISP license. I believe it is free to send unlimited amounts of individual E-mails, but bulk E-mail isn't allowed without paying extra. You would have to check whether mailing lists would be allowed to have the Habeas headers included, for example.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
