Or, in other words, "Was the filtering written in a way that the performance could easily be improved?"Does it take Declude more, the same or less in resources and time to "filter" a 100k message where the filter has 50 lines than it would a at least decently written program that would "filter" a 100k message for 50 items?
Given the way it is currently set up, it probably could be improved a bit. However, from what I've heard, it is much more efficient than the IMail filters. And, we haven't heard of anyone with performance issues with the filters, so it is probably a moot point.
-Scott
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
