Shouldn't this message ID cause a "BADHEADERS" failure:
Message-ID: <<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
since "athlon" is not guaranteed to be a unique occurrence (because it's not a FQDN)?
Technically, it should. :)
We used to have the BADHEADERS test check for this. However, the problem is that probably at least 1/2 of all mail clients are not RFC-compliant, in that they use a non-fully-qualified hostname ("athlon" rather than "athlon.example.com"). I just checked the last 3 personal E-mails I received, and all 3 had Message-ID: headers with a non-fully-qualified hostname.
Although we normally like to push people into compliance, this is a war we won't be able to win.
-Scott
---
Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver vulnerability detection.
Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
