Scott, FWIW, I have had very good success with the ip4r test:
ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org
but found lots of FP with the domain based test:
whois.rfc-ignorant.org
So I don't use that whois test any more. However, this has not been your
experience?
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results
> All of those tests are free. The ones you list have just been added to
the
> default configuration files, except for IPWHOIS (which has a lot of false
> positives in our testing) and SORBS (which we do not have enough
> information about yet).
> -Scott
>
> At 08:50 AM 6/16/2003, Serge wrote:
> >Thanks for the valuable info
> >are all the test below free and can be used by all of us ?
> >and, if yes, why weren't they included in the default global.cfg ?
> >
> >EASYNET-PROXIES ip4r proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl * 2 0
> >BLITZEDALL ip4r opm.blitzed.org *
> >3 0
> >EXSILIA-SPAM ip4r spam.exsilia.net *
> >3 0
> >IPWHOIS ip4r ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org *
> >3 0
> >SORBS ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net
> >* 3 0
> >SPAMHAUS ip4r sbl.spamhaus.org *
> >3 0
> >
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Markus Gufler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 9:14 AM
> >Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DSBL Tests - results
> >
> >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Over the weekend I've configured the following ip4r-tests from
Bill.B's
> > > config file that we haven't used until now.
> > > This are the results after 10 hours (4 hours business time) In this
time
> > > we've catched around 300 spam messages.
> > >
> > >
> > > BLITZEDALL ip4r opm.blitzed.org * 3 0
> > > 95 positive test results. No FP. All spam messages failed also other
> > > ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > BONDEDSENDER ip4r query.bondedsender.org 127.0.0.10 -10 0
> > > Only one single positive test. At least no FP.
> > >
> > > DEVNULL ip4r dev.null.dk * 3 0
> > > No positive test result.
> > >
> > > DNSRBL-DUN ip4r dun.dnsrbl.net * 3 0
> > > 3 positive test results. No FP. All spam messages failed also other
> > > ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > DNSRBL-SPAM ip4r spam.dnsrbl.net * 1 0
> > > No positive test result.
> > >
> > > DSBL-MULTI ip4r multihop.dsbl.org * 2 0
> > > Nearly all of the 38 positive responses are FP's. Bad test!!!!
> > >
> > > EASYNET-DYNA ip4r dynablock.easynet.nl * 3 0
> > > Nearly all of the 130 positive responses are FP's. Bad test!!!!
> > >
> > > EASYNET-PROXIES ip4r proxies.blackholes.easynet.nl * 2 0
> > > 165 positive test results. No FP. All spam messages failed also other
> > > ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > EXSILIA-PROXIES ip4r proxies.exsilia.net * 3 0
> > > No positive test result.
> > >
> > > EXSILIA-SPAM ip4r spam.exsilia.net * 3 0
> > > One single positive response. Was the only ip4r-test catching this
spam
> > > message.
> > >
> > > FABEL ip4r spamsources.fabel.dk * 3 0
> > > 22 positive test results. No FP. Most spam messages failed also other
> > > ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > FIVETEN-SRC ip4r blackholes.five-ten-sg.com 127.0.0.2 2 0
> > > 129 positive results. Around 20% FP's. Most spam messages failed also
> > > other ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > FIVETEN-DUL ip4r blackholes.five-ten-sg.com 127.0.0.3 1 0
> > > No positive test result.
> > >
> > > FIVETEN-OPTIN ip4r blackholes.five-ten-sg.com 127.0.0.4 1 0
> > > Two positive test results. Failed also other ip4r-tests.
> > >
> > > FIVETEN-MULTI ip4r blackholes.five-ten-sg.com 127.0.0.5 1 0
> > > 3 positive test results. Failed also SPAMCOP.
> > >
> > > FIVETEN-SINGLE ip4r blackholes.five-ten-sg.com 127.0.0.6 1 0
> > > No positive test result.
> > >
> > > IPWHOIS ip4r ipwhois.rfc-ignorant.org * 3 0
> > > 41 positive test results. No FP. All spam messages failed also other
> > > ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > KITHRUP ip4r 3y.spam.mrs.kithrup.com * 2 0
> > > No positive test result.
> > >
> > > LEADMON ip4r spamguard.leadmon.net * 3 0
> > > 51 positive results. Around 50% FP's. Most spam messages failed also
> > > other ip4r-Tests. Bad test!
> > >
> > > SORBS ip4r dnsbl.sorbs.net * 3 0
> > > 179 positive results. Around 5% FP's. All spam messages failed also
> > > other ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > SPAMHAUS ip4r sbl.spamhaus.org * 3 0
> > > 58 positive results. No FP. All spam messages failed also other
> > > ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > SPAMBAG ip4r blacklist.spambag.org * 4 0
> > > A few positive test results. No FP. All spam messages failed also
other
> > > ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > > UCEB ip4r blackholes.uceb.org * 3 0
> > > A few positive test results. Around 5% FP's. All spam messages failed
> > > also other ip4r-Tests
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> >(http://www.declude.com)]
> > >
> > > ---
> > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> > > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > >
> >
> >---
> >[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> >(http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> >---
> >This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> >unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> >type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> >at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
