Here is something I just noticed. This spam message failed 3 blacklist tests however two of them are reading from spamhaus.org so basicly it held the message based on SBLs info alone (each test weighted 5, i hold at 14)
X-RBL-Warning: OSSOFT: http://spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL8887 X-RBL-Warning: EASYNET-DNSBL: Included from Spamhaus SBL: http://spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL8887 X-RBL-Warning: SBL: Listed on SBL: http://spamhaus.org/SBL/sbl.lasso?query=SBL8887 So I pose the question is SBL accurate enough to allow a message to be held on its info alone? Whats the point of these other DNS tests if they are pulling from a RBL we are already querying? its like repeating the same test. Would it make sense to have Declude check for this situation? Rick Davidson Buckeye Internet Inc www.buckeyeweb.com 440-953-1900 ext: 222 --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
