That would be cool, but wouldn't that increment from zero, so that even one
single comment would score a 6?
Erik
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill Landry
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 12:28
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
>
>
> Another way to scale the weight of this test is to use:
>
> COMMENTS comments weight x 5 0
>
> where the test will accumulate the total number of
> obfuscation comments it
> finds and add 5 to that number and apply that to the weight
> result for the
> test. I don't see the comments test documented on the
> JunkMail manual site
> yet, so Scott, please correct me if I am wrong.
>
> Bill
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tandem Group" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:46 AM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
>
>
> > That's right. Each is incremental, so if you have 75
> comments it will give
> a
> > weight of 10+10+10=30
> >
> > You may wish to change the weight assigned for each to suit your
> > circumstances. We use a weight system at approx. twice the
> default ones in
> > order to arrive at a safe delete point of 100.
> >
> > Erik
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of paul
> > > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 11:47
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] sure to be silly question
> > >
> > >
> > > > Here's what I did with the comments: I created the
> following tests
> > > >
> > > > COMMENTS20 comments 20 x 10 0
> > > > COMMENTS40 comments 40 x 10 0
> > > > COMMENTS60 comments 60 x 10 0
> > > > COMMENTS80 comments 80 x 10 0
> > > > COMMENTS100 comments 100 x 10 0
> > > > COMMENTS120 comments 120 x 10 0
> > >
> > > Hmmm, ok, so am I reading this right? COMMENTS20 checks for
> > > 20 comments? if
> > > there are 20 comments, 10 is added to the weight, etc etc. ?
> > >
> > > Let me know if I'm right and I'll add them in, sounds
> > > promising, I think I
> > > may give these a HOLD action / zero weight first, to see how
> > > they work.
> > >
> > > Thanks Erik,
> > >
> > > Paul
> > >
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]
> > >
> > > ---
> > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> > > (http://www.declude.com)]
> > >
> > > ---
> > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> > > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> > >
> >
> > ---
> > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
> >
> > ---
> > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> > at http://www.mail-archive.com.
> >
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
