Thanks for all the great feedback. I'm still drowning in 50,000+ SoBig message/day but at least I now have them balanced over both 5gig servers instead of just one. What kills me is that the vast majority are headed for a single customers info@ address.
Matt, by this: > This does tie back into processor utilization though, because >before the definitions were available, the banned extension >test was placing those E-mails in a hold (wish you could have >them deleted).� The system seems though to scan the attachments >first and then look for attachments to ban by extension, and >that order could be reversed to save processing power.� I >assume this because the virus detection is now catching these >files subsequent to the definitions update instead of the >banned extension test doing the dirty work.� are you saying that I could set up Fprot to scan for .pif files and then have it run before Declude's junk filters, holding/deleting them, saving the CPU from scanning these messages with my junk tests? Can this be confirmed, Scott? Dan --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
