Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Experience with Statistical Filtering [IMail 8.02]

[Matthew Bramble]

Please let me know if you are finding opt-in ads like Amazon.com, JCrew.com, etc, are passing the IMail tests confidently.  Also, newsletters, especially of the graphical type.  The two herustics-types of tests that I have tried so far have been catching such things.  This gray area stuff accounts for the majority of my false positives without a test similar to the one you are using. Matt Kami Razvan wrote: Hi;   Just wondering if others have experimented with the Statistical Filtering of IMail.  I am simply sharing what I have seen so far since last week.   I started testing it last week and so far it is showing good results.  Several instances it was enough weight to block a spam that would have otherwise gone through with our filters.   I simply enabled Statistical Filtering and chose Insert Header option.   then added the following to our header filter:   HEADERS          3          CONTAINS          X-IMAIL-SPAM-STATISTICS: 0.9 HEADERS          5          CONTAINS          X-IMAIL-SPAM-STATISTICS: 1.   So far anything with 1 has been spam and several 0.9's are seen that all have been spam.  Basically I have not seen a false positive with the above.  I may increase their weights.. but need more time to test.   Anyone else has any experience?    Regards, Kami -- =================================================== Matthew S. Bramble President and Technical Coordinator iGaia Incorporated, Operator of NYcars.com --------------------------------------------------- Office Phone: (518) 862-9042 Cellular: (518) 229-3375 Fax: (518) 862-9044 E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] ===================================================