If you don't mind running a MX gateway or switching to a different one, Xmail server (www.xmailserver.org) does split all messages into individual recipients, I tested it. Downside is you will run declude for every recipient which will increase server load. I would guess at least a 5-10% increase in message volume, especially from those users that love to send junk to everybody they know every time.
Thanks, Chuck Frolick ArgoNet, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 2:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Multiple recipients seeing action I would actually think that this should be an configuration option in Imail, where if you wanted to, each incoming message, if to more than one recipient on the local server, would be separated. In other words, if Imail received a message destined to 3 people on the server, instead of creating one message and delivering it to 3 mailboxes, it would create 3 messages to deliver one to each mail box. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry > Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 10:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Multiple recipients seeing action > > > >I have a concern with messages to multiple recipients where the action > >chosen by a single recipient is used on others. > > Unfortunately, that's a problem inherent in SMTP, where a single E-mail can > be sent to multiple recipients -- and it's expected that the E-mail be > identical for all recipients. > > >Is this normal behaviour for DJM? If so, that would be a concern because > >obviously some mail which one person would delete would not get to another. > > That is correct. However, this is more a social issue -- if someone sends > a legitimate E-mail to multiple recipients, they need to realize that by > sending it as a single E-mail, the E-mail needs to be treated the same way > for all the recipients. > > We are, however, looking into ways around this. If we do, though, it would > require significant extra resources. > > -Scott > --- > Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers. > Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver > vulnerability detection. > Find out what you have been missing: Ask for a free 30-day evaluation. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
