|
That would work great at detecting old Compuserve accounts :) I'm not convinced that this would be a very clear marker for spam though (depends on what the automated real stuff does), but you could probably set up a filter to test the theory First create a filter file test and score it as a negative 2: SENDERNUM filter C:\IMail\Declude\SenderNum.txt x -2 0 Then fill the file with an entry for numbers 10-99, scoring each one as a single point: MAILFROM 1 CONTAINS 10 MAILFROM 1 CONTAINS 11 MAILFROM 1 CONTAINS 12 ... This would score the number of digits in succession as follows, note that it will score higher if the address has numbers surrounded by letters, and lower if it is only numbers: 1 num = N/A 2 num = -1 3 num = 0 4 num = 1 5 num = 2 6 num = 3 7 num = 4 8 num = 5 9 num = 6 10 num = 7 ... Obviously there are two primary problems with this approach. First, it can have up to 86 points if the string of numbers is long enough (too bad you can't cap the total score of the filter). Secondly, it benefits senders by one point with just 3 successive numbers in their address. I'm thinking that some autoreply/auto-ticket systems might trip this filter though if they use the address instead of something in the subject line to track a communication. This might be same type of reason that some spammers use this...they might be cleaning their list with the bounces that get through HELO??? Who knows, maybe it's worth a try if you are really that interested in exploring whether or not the real thing would work??? Real-people E-mail shouldn't be failing too many other tests, and the automated stuff suffers greatly. Maybe having 3 numbers only in an E-mail address is something that rarely happens with spam??? Matt John Tolmachoff (Lists) wrote: Any thoughts, good or bad? John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists) Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 10:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request How about a test like this: NUMBERSINMAILFROM It would be similar to SUBJECTSPACES but would count the amount of numbers in the mail from address. You could then configure it for say if 10 ormore,add 5 to the weight and so forth. John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA Engineer/Consultant eServices For You www.eservicesforyou.com |
- [Declude.JunkMail] New test request John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test req... Robert Grosshandler
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New test... Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request Markus Gufler
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test req... Kami Razvan
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request Colbeck, Andrew
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request Dan Patnode
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request Colbeck, Andrew
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] New test request Matthew Bramble
