No, Postfix sits in front of the IMail server. I see the Declude headers on
all other messages, and most other messages to the SpamAssassin list,
although I did just find another on from a different poster to the list that
also did not have any Declude headers.
For example, here are the headers for a different message posted to the
SpamAssissin list, with the Declude headers:
=====
Received: from intramail01.pointshare.net ([206.114.136.2]) by
psmail02.pointshare.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service
Version 5.5.2656.59)
id SX8KA7RF; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:46:57 -0700
Received: from gw2.pointshare.com [204.189.38.3] by
intramail01.pointshare.net with ESMTP
(SMTPD32-8.02) id AA56470004E; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:46:30 -0700
Received: from sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net
[66.35.250.206])
by gw2.pointshare.com (Mail Gateway) with ESMTP id D659AADDF1
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:46:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 19xpAn-0000pI-00; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:45:21 -0700
Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11]
helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 19xp7t-0000Tz-00; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:42:21 -0700
Received: from igtc.igtc.com ([66.166.73.180]
ident=[wGOOI4lfcJkBEBn+Q0iJV1k/rAJEnlkP])
by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 19xp7s-00069O-TS; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:42:20 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by igtc.igtc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8CEgI8c010893;
Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:42:18 -0700
Received: from sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net (lists.sourceforge.net
[66.35.250.206])
by igtc.igtc.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8CEfgmg010874
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:41:42 -0700
Received: from sc8-sf-list1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.13]
helo=sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list2.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 19xoUZ-0002Rg-00; Fri, 12 Sep 2003 07:01:43 -0700
Received: from sc8-sf-mx1-b.sourceforge.net ([10.3.1.11]
helo=sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net)
by sc8-sf-list1.sourceforge.net with esmtp
(Cipher TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 3.31-VA-mm2 #1 (Debian))
id 19xfFc-0003W7-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:09:40 -0700
Received: from adsl-216-103-211-240.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
([216.103.211.240] helo=proton.pathname.com)
by sc8-sf-mx1.sourceforge.net with esmtp (Exim 4.22)
id 19xfFc-0003DR-02; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:09:40 -0700
Received: from quinlan by proton.pathname.com with local (Exim 3.35 #1
(Debian))
id 19xfFa-0006rA-00; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:09:38 -0700
To: Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Dribble: Unknown bounce
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: Theo Van Dinter's message of "Thu, 11 Sep 2003 21:59:16 -0400"
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 52
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
X-Spam-Score: -1.8 (-)
Subject: [SA-Announce] Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc4 released
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9-sf.net
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.2 required=5.0
tests=BAYES_30,IN_REP_TO,KNOWN_MAILING_LIST,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,
REFERENCES,USER_AGENT_GNUS_XM
autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
X-Spam-Score: -2.7 (--)
X-Spam-Report: -2.7/5.0
The original message has been attached along with this report, so
you can recognize or block similar mail in future.
See http://spamassassin.org/tag/ for more details.
Content preview: One more thing (this will be noted in the documentation
in 2.60 or the next release candidate) ... if you use Razor2, you need
to apply a small patch to avoid taint-mode problems. Here are the
instructions. [...]
Content analysis details: (-2.70 points, 5 required)
IN_REP_TO (-0.5 points) Has a In-Reply-To header
REFERENCES (-0.5 points) Has a valid-looking References header
USER_AGENT_GNUS_XM (-0.3 points) X-Mailer header indicates a non-spam MUA
(Gnus)
PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF (-0.5 points) BODY: Contains what looks like a patch
from diff -u
KNOWN_MAILING_LIST (-0.9 points) Email came from some known mailing list
software
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Help:
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Id: Talk about SpamAssassin <spamassassin-talk.lists.sourceforge.net>
List-Unsubscribe:
<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive:
<http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk>
X-Original-Date: 11 Sep 2003 21:09:38 -0700
Date: 11 Sep 2003 21:09:38 -0700
X-IMAIL-SPAM-VALFROM: (74448974)
X-Alligate-In: FAILED - Score Adult: 0 (Req: 35) Spam: 34 (Req: 50) Tot: 34
(Req: 6)
X-Alligate-Tracking: BB33C3D457780B7D
X-Alligate-Signature: -1495166888
X-Alligate-SpoolFile: Dea560470004e9b89.SMD
X-Alligate-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [66.35.250.206]
X-RBL-Warning: HEADERS-FILTER: Message failed HEADERS-FILTER test (57)
X-RBL-Warning: HELO-FILTER: Message failed HELO-FILTER test (148)
X-RBL-Warning: MAILFROM-FILTER: Message failed MAILFROM-FILTER test (50)
X-RBL-Warning: REVDNS-FILTER: Message failed REVDNS-FILTER test (89)
X-RBL-Warning: SUBJECT-FILTER: Message failed SUBJECT-FILTER test (130)
X-RBL-Warning: ALLIGATE-SPAM-L1: Message failed ALLIGATE-SPAM-L1: 34.
X-RBL-Warning: ALLIGATE-SPAM-L2: Message failed ALLIGATE-SPAM-L2: 34.
X-RBL-Warning: SPAMCHECK: Message failed SPAMCHECK: 6.
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[66.35.250.206]
X-Queue-File: Dea560470004e9b89.SMD - outgoing
X-Note: This e-mail was scanned for viruses & filtered for spam
X-Note: Total spam test weight: -67
=====
Very strange...
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 3:36 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Baffled???
> > Note the conspicuously missing Declude headers. Any idea what would be
> > causing Declude to not add it's headers to this persons messages?
Scott,
> if
> > you would like me to run debug logging, I can, but who know how long
> before
> > this person posts to the list again.
>
> Do you have Imgate striping them?
>
> John Tolmachoff MCSE CSSA
> Engineer/Consultant
> eServices For You
> www.eservicesforyou.com
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
> .com.
>
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
