|
Yes, each of our own personal recommendations differ, but since they
are both based on personal opinions, it's no big deal :) I would tell you how to create a spam mailing program that would get past most anyone's configuration, however that I would be considered too sensitive for public consumption (you see, I do agree with part of your thesis). I guarantee you though that it could be done. I'm thinking that many don't bother because of the extra resources required, and those spamming off of open relays and the like are not operations that care much for the detail required since they can get so much of their stuff through to unfiltered accounts at present. Take a look at what gets through your filters at present and use that to look for clues. Matt Bill Landry wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Bramble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Kami Razvan
- [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelis... Keith Anderson
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Whit... Smart Business Lists
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Bill Landry
- [Declude.JunkMail] Email ad... Matthew Bramble
- [Declude.JunkMail] Email ad... Dan Spangenberg
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Emai... Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emai... Keith Purtell
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emai... Sean Fahey
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emai... Todd Holt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emai... Keith Purtell
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Emai... Keith Anderson
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFU... Kevin Bilbee
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFUSCATION filter - attachmen... Keith Anderson
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] OBFUSCATION filter - atta... Matthew Bramble
