Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RevDNS

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:06:47 -0700

It might be easier to get them to act as a secondary for your reverse DNS.  ISP's don't typically like to delegate control of such things.  It works just as effectively and DNS's auto notification features allow my changes for instance to be published immediately to the ISP's authoritative DNS server.

Matt


EN wrote:
I finally got this figured out.
What I needed to do was have my ISP delegate control of my subnet to our
server.
Easy enough but I guess I wasn't fully aware of their settings to see what
was going on in order to
come to this conclusion.
Thanks for the help.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] RevDNS


  
I'm guessing that your local DNS server thinks that it is
        
authoritative for
  
reverse DNS lookups, but doesn't have a reverse DNS entry for
        
209.7.3.194.
  
When you say local, you are talking about the internal Private DNS
      
server,
  
right?
      
By "local" I mean the DNS server that IMail uses.

    
Or the dns of imail?  I just added a reverse zone on my private DNS
      
server
  
for the ip in question, as well as others ( had to be a classless zone
      
too),
  
but I am still getting the same warnings.
      
That will happen if the DNS server that IMail uses reports that
    
209.7.3.194
  
has no reverse DNS entry (which would be incorrect, since it does have a
reverse DNS entry).

                                                    -Scott

Reply via email to