Below is the declude warnings from an email I got. I was wondering how IPNOTINMX tripped when as per HELOBOGUS there are no MX or A records? Since there is no MX record isn't it impossible for there to be an IP in a record that doesn't exist?

Am I right about my logic above? Am I just up too late? The mail was caught cause I catch on 20, but I was curious about the IPNOTINMX showing up.

-Josh

From: suzanne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hey
Date: September 21, 2003 12:10:59 AM EDT
To: Firstname Lastname <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from D6Z9X2 [68.68.245.212] by joshie.com (SMTPD32-8.03) id A50412D200C8; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:11:48 -0400
X-Priority: 3 (normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2616
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rbl-Warning: SPAMCOP: Blocked - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?68.68.245.212
X-Rbl-Warning: FIVETENSRC: 212.245.68.68.blackholes.five-ten-sg.com.
X-Rbl-Warning: NOABUSE: Not supporting [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Rbl-Warning: BASE64: A binary encoded text or HTML section was found in this E-mail.
X-Rbl-Warning: HELOBOGUS: Domain D6Z9X2 has no MX or A records.
X-Rbl-Warning: SPAMDOMAINS: Spamdomain '@yahoo.' found: Address of [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent from invalid fl-wdel-u2-c6bb-212.atlsfl.adelphia.net.
X-Rbl-Warning: GIBBERISH: Message failed GIBBERISH test (84)
X-Rbl-Warning: ANTIGIBBERISH: Message failed ANTIGIBBERISH test (14)
X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [68.68.245.212]
X-Declude-Spoolname: D250412d200c8c414.SMD
X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam.
X-Note: This E-mail was sent from fl-wdel-u2-c6bb-212.atlsfl.adelphia.net ([68.68.245.212]).
X-Spam-Tests-Failed: SPAMCOP, FIVETENSRC, NOABUSE, BASE64, HELOBOGUS, SPAMDOMAINS, GIBBERISH, ANTIGIBBERISH, IPNOTINMX, NOLEGITCONTENT, SPAMLOW [34]
X-Country-Chain: UNITED STATES->destination

Reply via email to