RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriCrime

[Kevin Bilbee]

I think for this to stick they need to change the letter to address the issue of other TLD systems that do the same thing. YOU are TARGETING one company when in fact others started this before Verisign with other TLDs.   If this is what you actual believe on its technical merits/violation of the RFCs then the letter should be expanded to include all companies that manage TLD root servers that return and answer for non-existent domains.   Although I think the letter makes good technical points, I think it is misplaced to reference only Verisign.   I would sign a letter that includes all companies that manage TLD root servers that return answers for non-existent domain names.       My two cents. Kevin Bilbee -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Phillip Holmes Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 7:29 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriCrime Petition against VeriCrime's abuse of root operation:   http://www.whois.sc/verisign-dns/   Best Regards, Phillip B. Holmes     -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of serge Sent: Saturday, September 20, 2003 5:22 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Veriscam oops just found something in the archive, please disregard my question if it was already explained here in simple tems i will read the archives and see if i get it :)