|
It would solve that issue, however I'm a big promoter of never using a
domain that you don't own when you can avoid it because it creates a
liability, though not on simple replies. I've worked with many to help
them remove any trace of an old ISP account and this might tell their
receivers that the un-owned account is still active. I'd rather
whitelist them instead, it would be less work. I'm not worried about adding a couple extra points to that stuff though since their ISP's mail server should be fairly clean, and I have decided that rejecting valid E-mail from a server marked as an open relay isn't in fact a false positive, though this only rarely happens. It's the non-customers sending valid stuff that is forged and the hardware devices that send out notifications which tend to have difficulties in passing some of the technical tests (HELOBOGUS, BADHEADERS and SPAMHEADERS among others). I already have some issues with this stuff FP'ing and bounces aren't useful in the second instance. Matt Bill Landry wrote: ----- Original Message ----- From: Matthew Bramble |
- [Declude.JunkMail] COUNTRY test Scot Desort
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] COUNTRY test R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam fake... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Eje Gustafsson
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam... Keith Anderson
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] blocking spam faked as coming from ... Glenn \\ WCNet
