Josh, >From that RFC: The IESG notes that this mechanism makes use of the .local top-level domain (TLD) internally when handling host names that don't contain any dots, and that this mechanism might not work in the expected way should an actual .local TLD ever be registered.Probably safe, but by no means assured at this point. Matt Joshua Levitsky wrote:
|
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail]... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... Joshua Levitsky
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... Matthew Bramble
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail]... Jonathan C Miller
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail]... R. Scott Perry
- [Declude.JunkMail] cou... Doug Bevins
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... Joshua Levitsky
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... Matthew Bramble
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail]... Joshua Levitsky
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail]... ISPhuset Nordic AS
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail]... Keith Anderson
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriSteal is ste... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriSteal is stealing tra... ISPhuset Nordic AS
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriSteal is stealing tra... Bill Landry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] VeriSteal is stealing tra... Bud Durland