The message-length limit in particular is probably destined to be revised. We should 
have some
control over this. Such as the ability to change it, or the ability to change the 
limit when certain
parameters are met.

Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator
VantageMed Operations (Kansas City)
Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole 
use of the
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any 
unauthorized
review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended 
recipient, please
contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Shacklett
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 11:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How does this spam trick work
>
>
> And I'm seeing more and more of these messages with the text
> section crafted
> cleverly to try and avoid blocks, and with more and more of
> them with these
> text sections large enough to defeat scanning of the message
> proper by the
> usual battery of content-based tests. I think Kami pointed this out
> recently, and I see that this is rapidly getting worse; we're
> going to need
> a new way to approach these, I think.
>

---
[This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to