Matt, I'm trying to understand the logic behind including content you don't want to block in both the capture and anti-capture files. Why add the extra processing required to parse both files to tag some content and then tag it again with the same negative weight, just so it can end up with a zero weight again? If you don't tag it with a positive weight in the first place, you will not need to tag it again with a negative weight, and you still have the same end result, content that has zero weight applied to it, and you've saved the CPU cycles.
I must be missing something here...? Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matthew Bramble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 5:14 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] GIBBERISH v1.0.5 available, plus new versions of others > Ok, the GIBBERISH filter is finally updated. It has a bunch of tweaks > from the time when I last shared the file publicly. Among the changes > are exclusions for mail clients by way of either their behaviors or by > way of some identifier, additional word and acronym exclusions a couple > of which are pretty common (QTR for instance), and something that I > believe makes the filter much less apt to false positive on E-mail, it's > a group of words that are indicative of auto-generated codes, from part > numbers to passwords. The trick with the last part is that while a > customer number for instance probably won't include one of the offending > strings that this filter looks for, it's indicative of the type of > message that has a much higher chance of becoming an FP on this test. > I'm expecting with this change that I will see far fewer FP's, which I > base on a cursory review of a month's worth of monitoring (though not > always attentively). > > Although adding the "Auto-generated Codes" counterbalances to the > GIBBERISHSUB filter isn't going to make a big impact, I went ahead and > included it anyway just to be safe, and added a few additional word > exclusions. I also added an additional method of detecting > forwarded/attached messages to Y!DIRECTED in order to further prevent > the possibility of FP'ing. > > So, all three filters were updated this morning. > > MailPure :: Filter Software :: Declude Filters > http://www.mailpure.com/software/decludefilters/ > > Please keep reporting bugs when you find them. I'll work on updating > the DYNAMIC filter next. > > Enjoy, > > Matt > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
