Hi Kami,

According to my notes . . .

  COMMENTS  comments  weight  x  10  0

  In the above case, the weight of the E-mail will be increased by the
  number of anti-filtering comments that are found (plus the base
  weight of the test). So if there are 3 in there, the weight will be
  increased by 13 (10 for failing the test, and 1 for each
  anti-filtering comment found). If there are 40 such comments, a
  total of 50 would be added to the weight of the E-mail.

The following is from the global, available from the junkmail manual:

  COMMENTS        comments        x       x       7       0

The following is from our global:

  COMMENTS   comments      5       x       10      0

  In the above case, the test will only fail those e-mails which
  contain 5 or more anti-filtering comments.

HTH

Thanks,


Monday, December 1, 2003, 4:46:04 AM, Kami Razvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
KR> Hi..
 
KR> I have searched all over the archive and the manual and can't find what
KR> exactly it is that we have added to our global statement.  I know that it
KR> must have made sense when we added it.. 
 
KR> COMMENTS   comments   weight  x   5  0
 
KR> The manual only talks about the test but has no examples.. I know the
KR> comments test but how does the above work?
 
KR> It will add the weight if 5 or more comments are found?
 
KR> So if there are 15 comments in the body what would the weight be?
 
KR> May be it is too early and my brain is not functioning yet... :)
 
KR> Regards,
KR> Kami



----
Don Brown - Dallas, Texas USA     Internet Concepts, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]         http://www.inetconcepts.net
PGP Key ID: 04C99A55              (972) 788-2364  Fax: (972) 788-5049
Providing Internet Solutions Worldwide - An eDataWeb Affiliate
----

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to