I wish we could also skip the tests for negative weight.. Because right nowI believe the idea here is to place the negative weight filters before the positive weight ones. Unless you want to totally whitelist something based on a filter (as opposed to pseudo-whitelisting it by crediting just some points), it makes sense that you wouldn't have a minimum weight. I guess I'm not really very trusting of anything not whitelisted on my system.
the emails that we want to be delivered by negative weight actually will go
through all tests since none can exit on a negative limit.
I start my order with pseudo-whitelists, and then pseudo-blacklists, then the highest scoring filters that don't make much use of the body down to the lowest scoring filters that do heavy body searches. When I have ANTI files, I list those before the main tests. The logic is a little sloppy in the middle, but it seems to be the right idea.
Naturally, it would also make sense to have absolutely everything else run before the custom filters. I suspect the IPNOTINMX thing is a bug instead of something by design.
Matt
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
