Scott,

Am I coorect to assume ANYWHERE CONTAINS is the most expensive filter to run?

[In lieu of having separate SUBJECT CONTAINS and BODY CONTAINS I have been using 
ANYWHERE CONTAINS.]

-Nick Hayer

---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "R. Scott Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>The combination of BODY CONTAINS or HEADERS CONTAINS (such as "BODY 5 
>CONTAINS ThatDrugThatBeginsWithTheLetterV") are the only ones that will 
>normally cause high CPU usage.  Others can, by would require many more 
>entries (for example, it may take 50,000 SUBJECT CONTAINS filter lines to 
>use the same CPU usage as 1,000 BODY CONTAINS filter lines).
>
>                                                    -Scott
>---
>Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
>Declude Virus: Catches known viruses and is the leader in mailserver 
>vulnerability detection.
>Find out what you've been missing: Ask about our free 30-day evaluation.
>
>---
>[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
>
>---
>This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
>unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
>type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
>at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to