> A warning implies that you can choose to ignore it - and > error implies that it must be corrected. It's either or > error, or it is NOT. A "possible error condition" by > definition is NOT an error, it's a WARNING. Why reinvent the > English language? >
I find know where in any English dictionary that say's an error must be corrected.. And as Scott posted previously.. That error can be ignored. It would appear that part of the test is checking for a valid 'wwww' domain and not any particular googleplex combination of a domain. Your point on this really is moot. I would wager to state that 99.99999% of the people around this world, that uses this 'FREE' service, understand it without much thought. > I don't have a problem if DNSREPORT were to WARN me (yellow) > that I have not configured a web site just IN CASE I meant > to. I could ignore the warning. > > I do have a problem that it first reports an ERROR, something > that needs fixing - but then I have to read the fine-print to > learn, that it really is NOT an error, it's meant as a > warning, just in case. Oh hello - if it's really a warning, > why call it an error! > There is no fine print.... If you don't want www then ignore the error. > I think once DNSreport takes such liberties in confusing very > straight-forward black and white results, it loses it's value > as a "reporter of fact". Fact of the matter remains: it > reports an error (red) for this site when there is NONE! Now > THAT is an error! > Oh come on.. What liberties.. They aren't trying to reinvent english, dns, or even force an ishihara test on you. You need to give them credit for allowing you to quickly test your dns.. Every tried to get similar results via dig? > I have customers that have 10 domains names reserved (for > trademark protection reasons) for every one web domain. They > choose not to support 'www' for those domains since they are > undesirable names and they don't want them "solidified" by > eventually appearing in search engines, etc. None of their > DNS zones are erroneous by anyone's definition, except for > DNSreport.com. > There isn't any erroneous data being returned.. Honestly. ~Rick ___________________________________________________________________ Virus Scanned and Filtered by http://www.FamHost.com E-Mail System. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
