----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete McNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well, I was surprized at the difference between Sniffer (91%) and Spam > Assassin (61%). I was particularly surprized because the Sniffer > rulebase being used is the demo and it is restricted by 15 days. Yes, that is quite impressive. > Up to now we have had sketchy info about how we compared with SA and > most of the comments we had seen indicated that our capture rate was > comparable. This blows that theory out of the water by 30%!!!. However, SA performance is really predicated on what rules and pattern files the user is running. There are a bunch of third-party cf rulesets that can be plugged into SA that improve its performance. Nick, do you happen to be running any additional rulesets, or are you simply running the default SA rules? Bill --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
