|
Sharyn and
others, you can make a big dent in the pharmacy spammers' campaigns by
picking the apppropriate RBLs, particularly with a hold weight as low as
10.
As the Chief
SortMonster pointed out, these bad guys make heavy use of zombies, so a trip
to
Would be well
worth your time. I'm finding that these are very effective:
XBL
DSBL
NJABL
SORBS
And more
generally:
FIVETENSRC
SPAMCOP
And last,
everyone needs the:
SPAMDOMAINS
test that was
introduced in April 2003 and is implemented in the current release
(v1.75). Check the mailing archive for an excellent sd.txt to fuel
it.
As per the usual
best-practice discussed on this list, I also recommend not putting a HOLD or
DELETE action on any one test; give each test a low enough weight that you can
be comfortable that it alone will not give you a false positive and hold the
wrong mail. Start low and then raise the weights once you've evaluated
each new test on it's own merits in your environment.
Andrew
8)
|
Title: Message
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached message Frederick Samarelli
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached mess... Sharyn Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached message Mike Leonard
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached mess... Sharyn Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached message Pete McNeil
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached message Bill
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached mess... Sharyn Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached message John Carter
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached mess... Sharyn Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached ... Kami Razvan
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached message Colbeck, Andrew
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Blocking the attached mess... Sharyn Schmidt
