|
Kami, I turned SKIPIFWEIGHT off for this version of the test and found that it scored over 40% of my spam. With SKIPIFWEIGHT on, it scores around 3% to of the spam (stuff that would have been held or hadn't yet reached a hold weight). Because this hits only combinations of tests, you are much more likely to be hitting things that have already scored at least close to your hold range. I expect that this will have only a little impact on the spam that's getting through my system, though there's not much opportunity there, but it will most definitely help to clear out about my hold file. I have another version that I may share here later on that increases the hit rate to well over 50% of spam without SKIPIFWEIGHT (5% of spam with) and targets about 10% of a hold file, and has a much better chance of finding stuff that might have scored lower than Hold. The new test adds points to 80% of the DUL hits that land in my Hold file, and from about 2,500 DUL hits a day on my system, I'll probably only end up with about 10 that are left within 250% of my Hold weight. The newer/unreleased version is also much more conservative with points, only adding 5 per combination, though most such E-mail ends up failing multiple combinations. I consider my system to be very tight, only holding less than 5% of spam from 10 to 24 points, so many might see an even better effect. Can you tell that I like numbers :) Matt Kami Razvan wrote:
-- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie Test Kami Razvan
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie Test Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie Test Kami Razvan
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie Test R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie Test John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Zombie T... Kami Razvan
