I wouldn't think so, since there are still lots of legit users of the Habeas headers that would be penalized if you were to do that. I would recommend simply not weighting the Habeas headers at all rather than adding weight for having them.
Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "Madscientist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 2:05 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Habeas Porn > At 04:41 PM 2/27/2004, you wrote: > >Today's related counts: > > > >My own Habeas filter: 17 > >HIL: 258 > >Number of my Habeas filters tripped that were in HIL: 1 > >Number of my Habeas filters tripped on my porn filter: 9 > > You know - it's probably crossed a mind or two - but it needs to be said. > Is it now time to use the Habeas test as a weighted indicator for spam? > > _M > > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
