I'm wondering if spammers are trying to the scare the public about industry/government attempts to control spammer behavior. Please note the enclosed message received by a co-worker.
Keith Purtell, Web/Network Administrator VantageMed Operations (Kansas City) CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. > -----Original Message----- > From: Pam NNNN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, March 15, 2004 2:00 PM > Subject: Is this a hoax > > Keith: > Is this another internet hoax? > > > Subject: Federal Bill 602P-Mail Charge > > Guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P charges 5-cents per > E-mail sent. It figures! No more free E-mail! We knew this > was coming!! > Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a > 5-cent charge on every delivered E-mail. > > Please read the following carefully if you intend to stay online and > continue using E-mail. The last few months have revealed an alarming > trend in the Government of the United States attempting to > quietly push > through legislation that will affect our use of the Internet. > > Under proposed legislation, the US Postal Service will be attempting > to bill E-mail users out of "alternative postage fees." > > Bill 602P will permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent > surcharge on every e-mail delivered, by billing Internet Service > Providers at source. The consumer would then be billed in turn by the > ISP. Washington, DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without pay to > prevent this legislation from becoming law. > > The US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the > proliferation > of E-mail, is costing nearly $230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may > have noticed their recent ad campaign: "There is nothing like a > letter." > > Since the average person received about 10 pieces of E-mail per day in > 1998, the cost of the typical individual would be an additional 50 > cents a day -- or over $180 per year -- above and beyond > their regular > Internet costs. > > Note that this would be money paid directly to the US Postal Service > for a service they do not even provide. > > The whole point of the Internet is democracy and noninterference. You > are already paying an exorbitant price for snail mail because of > bureaucratic inefficiency. It currently takes up to 6 days for a > letter to be delivered from coast to coast. If the US Postal > Service is > allowed to tinker with E-mail, it will mark the end of the > "free" Internet > in the United States. > > Congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has even suggested a > "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all Internet service" above and beyond > the governments proposed E-mail charges. Note that most of the major > newspapers have ignored the story the only exception being the > Washingtonian which called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful > concept who's time has come" (March 6th, 1999 Editorial). Do not sit > by and watch your freedom erode away! > > Send this E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all your > friends and > relatives to write their congressional representative and say "NO" to > Bill 602P. > > It will only take a few moments of your time and could very well be > instrumental in killing a bill we do not want. > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
