Markus,
The rule in SA that punishes messages sent by IMail is very old, but apparently still there.
/Roger
Yesterday an *nix admin asked me what Email-client I use.
My answer: MS Outlook 2003 latest SP and Updates. Why?
His answer: Our local Spamassassin has catched my previous message as spam.
---- Start SpamAssassin results 5.50 points, 5 required; * 0.5 -- Received via SMTPD32 server (SMTPD32-n.n) * 1.1 -- BODY: Message is 40% to 50% HTML * 0.1 -- BODY: HTML included in message * 3.7 -- Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook * 0.1 -- Message looks like Outlook, but isn't ---- End of SpamAssassin results
I can't understand not a single of this 5 points.
Point 1: "Received via SMTPD32 server" => (10% of SA hold weight) Googling for "SMTPD32" returns most results regarding Imail server and some other results regarding email marketing companies. Looks like SA is punishing messages comming from Imail servers.
Point 2 & 3: My initial message was plain-text. So what SA has to regret about HTML?
Point 4 & 5: Looks like SA doesn't know the newest releases of MS Outlook but assigns 3.8 points (76% of the hold weight!!!)
Markus
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
--- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
