|
Statistics will give you a general idea. We generally hold messages at
a score of 10 or 13, but we stop processing custom filters using
SKIPIFWEIGHT when the score reaches 25 and we separate those messages
from the others since we feel +99.99% confident that they are spam and
this allows us to concentrate on reviewing the small amount that gets
held but scores lower. It's clear that after the RBL's and Sniffer run
over 90% of the spam is already beyond this weight, and our legitimate
message volume is less than 15%, so saying that our filters are run 25%
of the time is an understatement, it's more like 18% on our system.
YYMV of course. We take extra steps to move obvious patterns and
sources from our hold range to a score at or above 25 in order to
lighten the load of reviewing. Since custom filters in Declude are the costliest in terms of processing power, having a tight system and using a safe SKIPIFWEIGHT value (beta/interim releases only) can save you at least 75% of the load of JunkMail. We have probably about 8,000 lines of custom filters presently and it only appears to cause spikes on large legitimate messages which aren't common enough to be problematic at our current volume. AV scanning however is a problem, one that could be helped immensely by optimizations within Declude Virus, but that isn't your problem. Matt Dave Doherty wrote: Matt- My body filters only catch about 4% of messages, but I don't know how often they are run. Is htere a convenient way to tell?-d ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2004 12:40 PM Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments -- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments Dave Doherty
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments Mike Hyslip
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments Dave Doherty
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments Dave Doherty
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments Dave Doherty
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachments Matt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachm... Dave Doherty
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Declude and attachm... Dave Doherty
- [Declude.JunkMail] Content Rules plus/vs. ... Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Content Rules p... DLAnalyzer Support
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack que... Nick Hayer
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack que... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack que... Nick Hayer
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack que... Bonno Bloksma
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack que... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack que... Bonno Bloksma
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Hijack que... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Content Rules p... Matt
