Try this: Replace the 4 and the 1 in the 5th column with your desired weight. The black looks pretty good 99.6% of what it detects is spam The suspicious is about 90% of what it detects is spam The white wasn't worth using using for me. Too much spam detected as not-spam.
SENDERDB-BLACK ip4r pub.senderdb.net 127.0.0.2 4 0 #SENDERDB-WHITE-ALL ip4r pub.senderdb.net 127.0.0.3 0 0 SENDERDB-SUSPICIOUS ip4r pub.senderdb.net 127.0.0.4 1 0 Scott Fisher Director of IT Farm Progress Companies >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/07/04 04:10PM >>> Ok Bill... I know I am a day late and a dollar short.. but what would be the syntax to enter these in? Bennie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 1:12 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New IP4R lists available for use > Folks, I would like to announce the availability of a new IP4R database > that > includes a blacklist, whitelist, suspicious list, and a neutral list (IP > address' that have not been classified). Here is the breakdown on the > list > usage: > > Service hostname: pub.senderdb.net > > 127.0.0.2 Black List > 127.0.0.3 White List > 127.0.0.4 Suspicious List > 127.0.0.5 Neutral List > > They will be updating their web site today with some documentation and > contact info, but you can access it now at www.senderdb.com. > > A little history about the company providing these new lists: > > The parent company is Solid Oak Software, the developers of the popular > Cybersitter (www.cybersitter.com), parent filtering software. About a > year > ago they came out with a new spam-filtering gateway product call Alligate > (www.alligate.com), that was largely developed around their Cybersitter > technology. > > Throughout that year they realized that with over 500,000 mailboxes being > filter by Alligate gateways, they had a very large pool of data to work > with > in putting together some large and very accurate IP4R databases, which > spanned the IP4R database lists above. > > So, in an effort to give something back to the spam-fighting community, > they > decided to make these lists freely available. I personally have no > affiliation with the company, other than I have worked with then over the > past two years to test several of their products. I have been using their > new IP4R lists for about two weeks now, and have found them to be very > good > (high hit counts) and extremely accurate. > > And in case you're wondering, yes, I did ask if I could announce the > availability of these new databases on these various lists and was given > approval, so have at it... > > Bill > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- > [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] > > > --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus] --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
