|
David, Here
is the DNS workaround for win2003 servers. Basically win2003 increased
the packet size to larger than 512k when performing a DNS query. This is
a default setting in win2003. The problem is many firewalls still don’t
allow packets larger than 512k. Here is a link to a workaround from Microsoft:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;832223.
We have used this very successfully. David From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Matt David, First Question: I know this issue has been discussed in the past, but
I would like to make sure I understand the discussions: We are
contemplating revising the scoring to a 100 point scale I
assume that when the conversion is made that initially you select the value for
100 point and then proportionally adjust the scores up. Questions: What weight did you use for the 100
points? Was it the delete weight? Or the hold weight? or something in
between the values? Second Question:
I am receiving a lot of DNS timeout values, yet when I go the run the IP
address through NSLookup, it returns the address immediately. The primary
address on the server is a Windows 2003 DNS server, secondary addresses are
linux DNS servers. What DNS servers is Declude using when doing a
DNS lookup? As I recall, there was a way to specify these values in the
global.cfg but I was not able to locate any information on this.
Anyone have any recommendations or insight into the problem? Thanks for you help in advance, David
-- =====================================================MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.http://www.mailpure.com/software/===================================================== |
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 100 Point scale / DNS David
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 100 Point scale / DNS Colbeck, Andrew
