|
Danny, It's a special construct that I use to kludge a way to provide a difference in scoring of last hop DNSBL hits and prior-hop DNSBL hits. For instance, if you score a test on the last 3 hops and it hits an open relay type of list on the first hop, that isn't anywhere nearly as indicative of spam as a last hop open relay hit. With Declude, you can kludge it so that you can score both the last hop only or all hops. If I get a hit for both SPAMCOP(ALL) and SPAMCOP(LAST), this means that SpamCop hit minimally on the last hop. If I only get a hit for SPAMCOP(ALL), that means that the hit was on a prior hop. Yes, this is most definitely very effective, and I absolutely do wish there was a better way to do this in Declude by assigning the range of hops to test per entry in your config. An example of how to configure this with SpamCop would be as follows: SPAMCOP(LAST) dnsbl %IP4R%.bl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2 4 0 SPAMCOP(ALL) ip4r bl.spamcop.net 127.0.0.2 2 0 This is primarily effective with DNSBL's that track primarily open relays and not necessary with most static spammer lists although SBL has been acting like idiots as of late and including random blocks all the way up to whole class B's on residential class networks which severely weakens the value of SBL when scored the same on every hop. As far as my filter goes, you can remove all of the lines beginning with the one targeting SNIFFER hits. It will work just fine without these, but I included them just for good measure as I expect the spam patterns to change eventually. I do of course expect to see spammers cracking AUTH with much more frequency, and Earthlink at least appears to be inept at stopping it since this has been happening for over 3 months now and growing in scope. Matt Danny K wrote:
-- ===================================================== MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro. http://www.mailpure.com/software/ ===================================================== |
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spam Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn Spam Mark E. Smith
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Porn S... Matt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Earthlink Po... Mark E. Smith
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] ALL vs L... Scott Fisher
- [Declude.JunkMail] Slightl... Mark E. Smith
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail]... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
- RE: [Declude.JunkM... Mark E. Smith
- RE: [Declude.JunkM... John Tolmachoff \(Lists\)
