On 9 Nov 2004 at 22:54, Bill Landry wrote:
> Nick, I cannot think of any RHSBLs that would be candidates for
> urirhssub, other than the SURBLs that currently use bitmasked
> responses.
I did not have any in mind but I was looking over the setups and this
scenerio came to mind..
Thanks for you excellent help - I am beginning to come around to see
how this latest SA can compete w/Declude; I just need more work on
my learning curve.
-Nick
However, if there were an RHSBL that supported multi-quad
> responses (like DNSBLs do), I would try setting it up like: =====
> urirhssub URIBL_EX1 multiple.example.com. A 127.0.0.1 body URIBL_EX1
> eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_EX1') describe URIBL_EX1 Contains a URL
> listed in the EX1 blocklist tflags URIBL_EX1 net score URIBL_EX1 1.0
>
> urirhssub URIBL_EX2 multiple.example.com. A 127.0.0.2
> body URIBL_EX2 eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_EX2')
> describe URIBL_EX2 Contains a URL listed in the EX2 blocklist
> tflags URIBL_EX2 net
> score URIBL_EX2 1.0
>
> urirhssub URIBL_EX3 multiple.example.com. A 127.0.0.3
> body URIBL_EX3 eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_EX3')
> describe URIBL_EX3 Contains a URL listed in the EX3 blocklist
> tflags URIBL_EX3 net
> score URIBL_EX3 1.0
> =====
>
> This checks out fine with "spamassassin --lint", so I would think that
> it should work fine.
>
> Bill
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.
