I would rather not add six new tests to my config.  Would you recommend a
single SURBL test?  Which one seems to work better?

Regards,

Jason

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Darin Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 8:02 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SURBL as RHSBL


> Hi Bill,
>
> You seem to always be one of the first to share new blacklists.  Where do
> you find this info?  Is there another list that would be worth joining?
>
> Thanks, man.
>
> Darin.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bill Landry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:04 AM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SURBL as RHSBL
>
>
> Modification, since I was not thinking, but Declude JunkMail does not
> support bitmasked responses.  So instead of using the multi zone, you will
> need to use:
>
> SURBL_AB  rhsbl ab.surbl.org    127.0.0.2 1 0
> SURBL_JP  rhsbl jp.surbl.org    127.0.0.2 1 0
> SURBL_OB  rhsbl ob.surbl.org    127.0.0.2 1 0
> SURBL_PH  rhsbl ph.surbl.org    127.0.0.2 1 0
> SURBL_SC  rhsbl sc.surbl.org    127.0.0.2 1 0
> SURBL_WS  rhsbl ws.surbl.org    127.0.0.2 1 0
>
> Which will require six different queries if you want to use all SURBL
lists.
>
> Bill
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Bill Landry
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 12:47 AM
> Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SURBL as RHSBL
>
>
> Markus, if you want to test against all of the SURBLs, since it's only a
> single query to the multi zone, use:
>
> SURBL_AB  rhsbl multi.surbl.org    127.0.0.32 1 0
> SURBL_JP  rhsbl multi.surbl.org    127.0.0.64 1 0
> SURBL_OB  rhsbl multi.surbl.org    127.0.0.16 1 0
> SURBL_PH  rhsbl multi.surbl.org    127.0.0.8 1 0
> SURBL_SC  rhsbl multi.surbl.org    127.0.0.2 1 0
> SURBL_WS  rhsbl multi.surbl.org    127.0.0.4 1 0
>
> AB = AbuseButler data
> JP = Combination of Prolocation data & Joe Wein's SpamSpy data
> OB = OutBlaze data
> PH = Combination of MailPolice "Fraud" list data & MailSecurity "Phishing"
> list data
> SC = SpamCop top 200 hits data
> WS = William Stearns & submitter data
>
> I have been testing this for about an hour, and am getting a few hits.
> We'll see how it goes over the next 24 hours...
>
>
> Bill
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Markus Gufler
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 22, 2004 11:41 PM
> Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SURBL as RHSBL
>
>
> Is this the correct configruation line for doing this?
>
> SURBLS-RHSBL  rhsbl %MAILFROM%.sc.surbl.org  127.0.0.2 5 0
>
>
> Markus
>
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
> (http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>
> ---
> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
(http://www.declude.com)]
>
> ---
> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
> at http://www.mail-archive.com.
>

---
[This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)]

---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.  To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail".  The archives can be found
at http://www.mail-archive.com.

Reply via email to