On Monday, December 13, 2004, 5:42:08 PM, Bill wrote: BL> ----- Original Message ----- BL> From: "William Stillwell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Umm, Wouldn't the 0 9 setting put a Positive weight on a good clean email? >> >> shouldn't it be like >> >> SNIFFER external nonzero "c:\sniffer\win32\licenseid.exe authcode" 7 -7 >> >> which would put a Positive 7 on a nonzero return, and a -7 on a Zero BL> Return >> ? BL> Although Sniffer does exceptionally well at detecting spam, it is not BL> perfect. I send missed spam to the Sniffer spam address daily, so appling a BL> negative weight to non-Sniffer tagged e-mail will most likely result in BL> reduced weight of some spam messages, as well. It's better to just leave BL> the last field at zero. I want to resonate with this --- Sniffer's current rulebase is almost entirely black, so it is not really appropriate (in most cases) to negatively weight messages that are not trapped by SNF. _M --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
