|
I've compiled my spam test results over the last
year to look at test effectiveness trends.
If anyone is interested I've posted them on my
website. I've never really seen test effectiveness trended over a year period
anywhere else.
All tests spam vs. ham based on all emails. http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/Testsbymonth.html
Spam tests based on all spam emails. http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/spamtestbymonth.html
Ham tests based on all ham emails. http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/hamtestsbymonth.html
Warning these are large HTML files.
Some examples:
Spamcop triggered on 83% of my Feb 2004 spam emails
and has downward trended to 57% of my January 2005 spam emails.
Message Sniffer has stayed at 95-96% detection of
all spam emails from June 2004 to Jan 2005.
|
- [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Scott Fisher
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Dan Geiser
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Scott Fisher
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Dan Geiser
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Scott Fisher
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name a na... Nick
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] domain name ... Darin Cox
- Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] domai... Pete McNeil
- Re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] d... Darin Cox
- Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] domai... Pete McNeil
- Re: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] d... Darin Cox
