RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months

[Markus Gufler]

WOW! I've send this message over 46 hours ago. It's only me to receive it on the list so late?   Received: from declude.com [63.246.13.90] by mail.zcom.it with ESMTP   (SMTPD32-8.13) id A0E9C6600B6; Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:46:33 +0100 Received: from mail.zcom.it [217.199.0.33] by mail.declude.com with ESMTP   (SMTPD32-8.05) id ABE4656800A2; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 05:54:28 -0500 Received: from NB [127.0.0.1] by mail.zcom.it with ESMTP   (SMTPD32-8.13) id AC35211008C; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 11:55:49 +0100   I fear if this happens repeatedly an effective discussion is not more possible. Back to snail-mail?   Markus     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Markus Gufler Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2005 11:56 AM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months Hi Scott,   great stat's !   A question about SNIFFER It seems you have a much longer list of different SNIFFER return codes then I Is there somewhere a complete list?   Markus     From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:14 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam tests by months I've compiled my spam test results over the last year to look at test effectiveness trends.   If anyone is interested I've posted them on my website. I've never really seen test effectiveness trended over a year period anywhere else.   All tests spam vs. ham based on all emails. http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/Testsbymonth.html Spam tests based on all spam emails. http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/spamtestbymonth.html Ham tests based on all ham emails. http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/hamtestsbymonth.html   Warning these are large HTML files.   Some examples: Spamcop triggered on 83% of my Feb 2004 spam emails and has downward trended to 57% of my January 2005 spam emails. Message Sniffer has stayed at 95-96% detection of all spam emails from June 2004 to Jan 2005.