Title: Message
Sorry, I guess I misunderstood twice in this regard. I suppose that
for now, the old format is fine and the logging is better than before
being that it is only once per message instead of once per each
recipient. A normalized single line format would be preferable
overall, however I can think of many other things that would take
precedence on my wish list at the moment.
Matt
Andy Schmidt wrote:
>> but why change the logs to single
lines and not at the same time seek to normalize the format <<
They were not changed to single lines?
Single lines of ONE message were grouped
together - rather than scattered about. They are still single lines -
just the ORDER of their appearance in the log has changed. They are no
longer sorted strictly by "time" but rather by message.
May be I misunderstand what you are looking at?
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt
![]() H&M Systems Software, Inc.
600 East Crescent Avenue, Suite 203
Upper Saddle River, NJ 07458-1846
Phone: +1 201 934-3414
x20 (Business)
Fax: +1 201 934-9206
http://www.HM-Software.com/
I guess this is somewhat rhetorical at this point, but why change the
logs to single lines and not at the same time seek to normalize the
format using the same standards that are used for Web logs or even a
simple comma separated (quoted qualifier) database format?
Matt
--
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================
|
