Re: [Declude.JunkMail] catchallmails question

[Darrell \([EMAIL PROTECTED])]

Title: Message

Ben,   There are various conditions that can account for messages being picked up without being marked with the "CATCHALLMAILS" test.  A good bulk of these instances occur because a message under certain conditions will not log a "Test failed" line.   One example is "Whitelist AUTH" in this particular example the only line that is logged in the Declude log for that particular message is this.   02/28/2004 00:01:59 Q573700001524c9ad Skipping E-mail from authenticated user [EMAIL PROTECTED]; whitelisted.   In regards to DLAnalyzer it will count this as a message (as it should), but there will be no tests associated with it like "catchallmails" because the "Tests failed" line is not logged.  There are other situations where this also occurs, but that one stuck into my head.   Hope that helps. Darrell ------------------------------------------- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude And Imail.  IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. ----- Original Message ----- From: Imail Admin To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 7:54 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] catchallmails question Hi,   I have a strange question, which once against my astounding ignorance.  I just tried using DLAnalyzer Lite on our latest Declude JM log.  For the sample I tested, I got these results:   Total Messages Processed: 11,234 Messages That Failed Defined Test(s): 10,153 Percentage That Failed Defined Test(s): 90.38% Average Message Weight: 4 Average Message Weight/Failed: 5   TEST            # FAILED   Percentage WEIGHT10...........6,308.......56.15% CATCHALLMAILS......5,393.......48.01% NOLEGITCONTENT.....4,361.......38.82% IPNOTINMX..........4,237.......37.72% WEIGHT5............3,856.......34.32% WEIGHT10S..........3,564.......31.73% WEIGHT20...........3,509.......31.24% WEIGHT7............3,465.......30.84% SNIFFER............3,451.......30.72% SPAMCOP............3,006.......26.76% You can ignore the Weight tests; those are just weight ranges and not real tests.  Here's the thing: Catchallmails also is not a real test; it's supposed to catch all emails.  So why doesn't the Catchallmails statistic above show 100%?  The system is telling me that Catchallmails only caught 48%.   I should mention that Catchallmails comes in the global.cfg file after the regular tests, and after the weight ranges, but before a handful of whitelisted IPs.   Help, please?   Ben BC Web