Title: Message
The message is NOT whitelisted (see log and header), so the bypass whitelisting WORKED.  The log and headers look differently, if whilelisting is effective.
 
The purpose of the bypass whitelisting is:
 
if weight >= 12 and recipients >= 6 -> bypass the whitelist
if weight >= 14 and recipients >= 4 -> bypass the whitelist
if weight >= 19 and recipients >= 1 -> bypass the whitelist
 
It fulfilled the last two conditions.
(It should have fulfilled the first one - since there WERE 6 recipients, but that's a minor problem of GREATER vs. GREATER THAN).
 
Once again, I have NO per-user configuration!

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 12:50 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 2.x, High-Weight Junkmail Not Deleted

Maybe a bug/config issue with the bypass whitelisting.  Here's something that caught my eye:
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=19 (21) and at least 1 recipients (6).
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=14 (21) and at least 4 recipients (6).
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d NOT bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=12 (21) and at least 6 recipients (6).
That doesn't seem to make much sense to me, but I'm also not a bypass whitelist user.  Maybe this was recoded and no longer acts the same way as before under these conditions.  Also, this message actually failed more tests than what scored 21, but I assume that it excludes external tests and custom filters in the calculation used for bypass whitelisting.  Since those other scores weren't added in according to your headers, I am assuming that the bypass whitelisting setting took over and preempted the other tests from adding points and delivered the message regardless of what the logs suggest (DELETE).

Note that with the change in the DELETE action being per-user instead of per-message, it might be possible to abandon the bypass whitelisting config for a per-user config.

Matt



Andy Schmidt wrote:
I don't have actions for different recipients.
 
So in my case all recipients have the SAME action.
 
Except that now ROUTETO outranks DELETE.

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:55 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 2.x, High-Weight Junkmail Not Deleted

There was a change that will affect some configurations.  IMO, this was a major change, for better or for worse, and everyone should review their configurations for the potential of issues.

http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=122

JM

FIX

Changes DELETE action to only delete the E-mail for recipients using the DELETE action (so it will deliver to any other recipients)


Matt



Andy Schmidt wrote:
Hm,
 
I may have an idea...
 
I have the feeling the problem may be with the "POSTMASTER" filter.  The idea behind it is - if any of the recipients are my [EMAIL PROTECTED] account, then "drop" all other recipients and ROUTETO that email ONLY to the postmaster address.  This will prevent spam that includes the Postmaster address to reach all other mailboxes.
 
However, I suspect that somehow "ROUTETO" suddenly outweighs the DELETE action?
 
Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy Schmidt
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2005 11:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Version 2.x, High-Weight Junkmail Not Deleted

Hi,
 
As promised, I will submit this case to Declude support.
 
This message has a weight of 21 and should have been DELETEd and it's way PAST my HOLD weight of 10. It also is beyond my BYPASS WHITELISTING weight of 19.
 
Yet, this message was delivered to my mailbox!
 
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d SPAMCOP:7 SENDERDB-SUSP:1 XBL-DYNA:7 BCC4:2 SPAMDOMAINS:4 .  Total weight = 21.
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=19 (21) and at least 1 recipients (6).
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=14 (21) and at least 4 recipients (6).
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d NOT bypassing whitelisting of E-mail with weight >=12 (21) and at least 6 recipients (6).
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d L1 Message OK
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Subject: Get V1AGRA Anonymously!
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  IP: 82.127.69.49 ID:
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Tests failed [weight=21]: BYPASS19=IGNORE BYPASS14=IGNORE DSBLSINGLE=WARN SPAMCOP=WARN BLITZEDALL=LOG NJABLDYNA=LOG SORBS=WARN SORBS-DUHL=LOG SENDERDB-SUSP=IGNORE XBL-DYNA=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE BCC4=IGNORE SNIFFER=LOG INV-URIBL=LOG POSTMASTER=ROUTETO SPAMDOMAINS=IGNORE WEIGHTKILL=DELETE ACTIONDELETE=DELETE
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d L2 Message OK
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Subject: Get V1AGRA Anonymously!
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  IP: 82.127.69.49 ID:
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Tests failed [weight=21]: BYPASS19=IGNORE BYPASS14=IGNORE DSBLSINGLE=WARN SPAMCOP=WARN BLITZEDALL=LOG NJABLDYNA=LOG SORBS=WARN SORBS-DUHL=LOG SENDERDB-SUSP=IGNORE XBL-DYNA=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE BCC4=IGNORE SNIFFER=LOG INV-URIBL=LOG POSTMASTER=ROUTETO SPAMDOMAINS=IGNORE WEIGHTKILL=DELETE ACTIONDELETE=DELETE
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d L3 Message OK
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Subject: Get V1AGRA Anonymously!
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  IP: 82.127.69.49 ID:
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Tests failed [weight=21]: BYPASS19=IGNORE BYPASS14=IGNORE DSBLSINGLE=WARN SPAMCOP=WARN BLITZEDALL=LOG NJABLDYNA=LOG SORBS=WARN SORBS-DUHL=LOG SENDERDB-SUSP=IGNORE XBL-DYNA=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE BCC4=IGNORE SNIFFER=LOG INV-URIBL=LOG POSTMASTER=ROUTETO SPAMDOMAINS=IGNORE WEIGHTKILL=DELETE ACTIONDELETE=DELETE
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d R4 Message OK
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Subject: Get V1AGRA Anonymously!
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  IP: 82.127.69.49 ID:
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Tests failed [weight=21]: BYPASS19=IGNORE BYPASS14=IGNORE DSBLSINGLE=WARN SPAMCOP=WARN BLITZEDALL=LOG NJABLDYNA=LOG SORBS=WARN SORBS-DUHL=LOG SENDERDB-SUSP=IGNORE XBL-DYNA=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE BCC4=IGNORE SNIFFER=LOG INV-URIBL=LOG POSTMASTER=IGNORE SPAMDOMAINS=IGNORE WEIGHTKILL=DELETE ACTIONDELETE=DELETE
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d L5 Message OK
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Subject: Get V1AGRA Anonymously!
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  IP: 82.127.69.49 ID:
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Tests failed [weight=21]: BYPASS19=IGNORE BYPASS14=IGNORE DSBLSINGLE=WARN SPAMCOP=WARN BLITZEDALL=LOG NJABLDYNA=LOG SORBS=WARN SORBS-DUHL=LOG SENDERDB-SUSP=IGNORE XBL-DYNA=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE BCC4=IGNORE SNIFFER=LOG INV-URIBL=LOG POSTMASTER=ROUTETO SPAMDOMAINS=IGNORE WEIGHTKILL=DELETE ACTIONDELETE=DELETE
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d L6 Message OK
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Subject: Get V1AGRA Anonymously!
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]  IP: 82.127.69.49 ID:
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Tests failed [weight=21]: BYPASS19=IGNORE BYPASS14=IGNORE DSBLSINGLE=WARN SPAMCOP=WARN BLITZEDALL=LOG NJABLDYNA=LOG SORBS=WARN SORBS-DUHL=LOG SENDERDB-SUSP=IGNORE XBL-DYNA=IGNORE IPNOTINMX=IGNORE NOLEGITCONTENT=IGNORE BCC4=IGNORE SNIFFER=LOG INV-URIBL=LOG POSTMASTER=ROUTETO SPAMDOMAINS=IGNORE WEIGHTKILL=DELETE ACTIONDELETE=DELETE
03/02/2005 19:42:43 Q5d7c1cc602a2951d Last action = "">
 
 
Received: from SMTP32-FWD by Mail.Webhost.HM-Software.com
  (SMTP32) id A5D7C1CC602A2951D; Wed,  2 Mar 2005 19:42:44 -0500
Received: from argosoft.com [82.127.69.49] by hm-software.com
  (SMTPD32-8.15) id AD7F1CC602A2; Wed, 02 Mar 2005 19:42:39 -0500
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:13:10 GMT
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Get V1AGRA Anonymously!
Content-Type: text/html;
X-RBL-Warning: Suspected SPAM. 82.127.69.49 found in list.dsbl.org. "http://dsbl.org/listing?82.127.69.49"
X-RBL-Warning: Suspected SPAM. "Blocked - see http://www.spamcop.net/bl.shtml?82.127.69.49"
X-RBL-Warning: Suspected SPAM. "Dynamic IP Addresses See: http://www.dnsbl.sorbs.net/lookup.shtml?82.127.69.49"
X-Declude: Version 2.0.4.2; D5d7c1cc602a2951d.SMD from lneuilly-152_21-6-49.w82-127.abo.wanadoo.fr [82.127.69.49]
X-Declude: Triggered [21] BYPASS19, BYPASS14, DSBLSINGLE, SPAMCOP, BLITZEDALL, NJABLDYNA, SORBS-DUHL, SENDERDB-SUSP, XBL-DYNA, BCC4, SNIFFER, INV-URIBL, POSTMASTER, SPAMDOMAINS, WEIGHTKILL
X-Countries: FRANCE->destination
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-RCPT-TO: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Status: U
X-UIDL: 409773234
 
 

Best Regards
Andy Schmidt

Phone:  +1 201 934-3414 x20 (Business)
Fax:    +1 201 934-9206

 

-- 
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================

-- 
=====================================================
MailPure custom filters for Declude JunkMail Pro.
http://www.mailpure.com/software/
=====================================================

Reply via email to